Everyone has heard or seen hair transplant horror stories, whether in a magazine, on the internet, or even in a senior relative’s obvious ‘plugs.’ Many celebrities, including Nicholas Cage, Brendan Fraser Mather MOcanhey, Dwayne Johnson (‘the Rock’, WWE), Salman Khan (Bollywood), and even Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, are believed to have undergone hair transplant surgery in recent years. Check Weight Loss Near Me.
Hair Transplantation’s History
Dr. Okuda, a Japanese dermatologist, pioneered hair transplant surgery by publishing a revolutionary method of using small grafts in a Japanese medical journal in 1939, which is similar to how hair transplantation is done today. Hair transplant grafts were used to replace hair that had been lost in various body areas, including the scalp, eyebrows, and moustache.
Dr. Norman Orentreich, a physician in particular, began to experiment with the idea of relocating or transplanting hair from the back and sides of the head to balding areas in the late 1950s. Experiments conducted by Dr. Orentreich revealed that bald resistant hairs transplanted from the back and sides of the head retained their bald resistant genetic trait regardless of where they were transplanted.
The “Donor Dominance” principle established that hair could be transplanted from bald resistant donor areas to balding areas and grow for the rest of one’s life. The groundwork for modern hair transplantation was laid here. Hair transplants became increasingly popular in the 1960s and 1970s. The standard of care, on the other hand, required the use of larger grafts that were removed with round punches and often contained a large number of hairs.
The large punch grafts were gradually replaced with a more refined combination of mini and micrografts in hair restoration surgery in the 1980s. The punch was no longer used to extract the bald resistant grafts in this “combination mini micrografting” hair transplantation procedure. Rather, a strip of bald-resistant hair from the back of the head was surgically removed and trimmed into mini and micrografts.
Hair Transplantation Types
Follicular unit hair transplant surgery can be done in two ways. Follicular unit transplantation, also known as FUT or’strip surgery,’ and follicular unit extraction, also known as FUE, are two procedures used to transplant follicular units. The process of removing the transplanted hair is the key difference. FUT and FUE are complementary types of HT rather than competitive approaches from which one must choose.
FUT vs. FUE: Which is Better?
In the 1990s, a highly refined surgical technique known as “follicular unit hair transplantation,” or “FUT,” was gradually introduced. This meticulous and time-consuming procedure transplants hairs into their natural one, two, three, and four hair “follicular unit groupings” in which they develop.
Dr. Robert Bernstein suggested and presented the idea of producing the whole hair restoration using only follicular units in the 1995 Bernstein and Rassman publication “Follicular Transplantation.” The invention of the binocular microscope by Dr. Bobby Limmer of San Antonio, Texas in the late 1980s was critical to the progress of the follicular unit hair transplant technique.
Dr. Limmer and his team were able to successfully separate and trim naturally occurring follicular units into individual grafts using the microscope to analyse the donor tissue. Dr. Limmer shared his methods and observations with his colleagues, and he was a strong advocate for follicular unit hair along with Drs. Bernstein, Rassman, and Seager.
Follicular hair transplants are thought to be the most successful hair restoration procedure. Hair from the permanent zone in the back of the scalp is transplanted into the infected areas of follicular hair transplant.
If you need a wide area protected, FUT is the best option because it is the most cost-effective in terms of grafts per dollar spent. If you totally, positively do not want strip surgery due to scarring concerns, FUE is your only choice. Both techniques, contrary to common opinion, leave scars. FUE leaves little unpigmented dots across the back of your head, while FUT leaves a thin line across the back of your head. The only difference is that FUE scars are not clustered together, making them more difficult to spot when hair is cut short.
FUE procedures are unquestionably more difficult on the grafts than FUT procedures. As a result, FUE’s final growth yields are usually lower than FUT’s. But, for the most part, BOTH procedures perform.